The future, I think, looks different.

Those of you who have been following this blog, know of the troubles that HippieHusband and I have experienced. And that the blogs I write carry a tone that oscillates between a little bit of bitch and a little bit of buddhist. I'm guessing that the more fun posts to read are the bitchy ones. I imagine, however, that all of us oscillate between these two personalities and the trick is finding the balance.

Lately, HippieHusband and I have started the process of looking for jobs elsewhere. But not just academia, we're opening ourselves up to everything. The process I started of finding out about post-academic careers was largely motivated by the distaste that SmallUniversity left in my mouth. It has since become less intransigent and more progressive or forward looking, more about the potential of a career in industry science and how cool it would be to work there. This has largely come from two things:

a.) the 5-6 informational interviews (some by telephone some via email) I have conducted and the 4-5 that HippieHusband has done over the last month and a half.

b.) This book I read, called "So what are you going to do with that?" by Susan Basalla and Maggie Debelius. A brilliant book, a must read for everyone, even if you're not considering a post-academic career. They provide strategies that help you decide if academia is for you and if it isn't how to market yourself to a variety of employers if you choose to leave. In addition, they share stories from people who transitioned into a multitude of careers outside academia. It is insightful, funny, inspiring and practical.


The scientists that HippieHusband and I talked with personally worked in vastly different areas including: drug discovery, biofuel research, agricultural biotech, and consulting. I talked with two women who were at very different levels - one a VP of Research and Development of a drug discovery company and the other a Lead Research Scientist at an Agbiotech company. Before talking with these women, I started reading about the science done at some of these places and frankly, I was stunned. The research was innovative, brilliant and fucking cool. A lot of science was basic research not just applications research.

In all cases, these scientists said that they were way less stressed out, felt truly valued, had time on the weekends and evenings, participated in a more team oriented science (because you are working toward a common goal as opposed, I suppose to self-aggrandizement), had sufficient freedom to design and lead research that was interesting, and that they were never bored. Many explained that the most challenging thing about transitioning from academia into industry was the reaction they got from their academic peers and supervisor. The second biggest obstacle was what lay in their own heads. As one scientist is quoted as saying in "So what are you,"

"Graduate students experience path failure when they assume that the same things that made them succesful up to this point will continue to do so when the time finally comes to find an academic position. Discovering that there are no tenure-track job openings in their field or that employers outside academia do not value their academic credential comes as a painful shock."

and

"Almost all the people in a given Ph.D. program have passed up other opportunities outside academia. It is transparently clear that their friends and acquaintances who have not made the choice to enter a Ph.D. program are reaping more material and, in many cases, psychological rewards than those who have chosen the Ivory Tower path. It is one thing to have delayed gratification if one ends up in the desired position in academia, but to have to go back out into the same job market that most graduate students shunned five or even ten years ago is likely to be a psychologically wrenching moment."

Yes, yes it is. In part because I was like many of my academic peers, a snob about industry science. But also because academia builds its own mythology of failure and prejudice around potentially fulfilling careers in business, government, etc. A simple example demonstrates this. I remember talking to one friend (now a prof) during my PhD about how I was quite worried about my competitive abilities to make it to a t-t job. The response, "Oh don't worry you could just find a biotech company or something and go do marker work with them."

This statement belies that mass delusion and disapproval that pervades the academic halls. My response to it also carried the same distaste but in addition had an implicit fear of failure. I was angry because she had unjustly labeled my science as not up to "academic standards." But really, given the crap I have to wade through in journal after journal just to find good science, and if I knew the high level science that industry did, I would have been able to see that as a compliment.

The future, I think, looks bright and exciting.